Quantcast
Monday, Oct. 20, 2014

Farm owners fined for refusing to host a wedding — for a lesbian couple

By Sarah Pulliam Bailey, Religion News Service

Published: Wed, Aug. 20 11:10 a.m. MDT

(Wavebreakmedia Ltd, Getty Images/Wavebreak Media)

Christian farm owners in upstate New York who declined a lesbian couple’s request to hold a wedding ceremony on their property have been fined $10,000 and ordered to pay the women $1,500 each.

Cynthia and Robert Gifford, who own Liberty Ridge Farm near Albany, rent their facilities for birthday parties and about a dozen weddings each year.

When Jennifer McCarthy and Melisa Erwin, a same-sex couple from Newark, N.J., requested to use the facility for their 2012 wedding, Cynthia Gifford offered the farm for a reception, but not for the wedding ceremony. Weddings typically are conducted on the first floor of the Giffords’ home or in an adjacent field.

“It literally hits close to home,” said the Giffords’ lawyer, James Trainor. He said the farm owners attend a community church and cite their religious belief of marriage between a man and woman for declining to hold a same-sex wedding on their property.

Administrative Law Judge Migdalia Pares of the Bronx rejected the owners’ argument that the farm, which is also their home, is not a place of public accommodation and is therefore not subject to the anti-discrimination provisions of New York’s Human Rights Law.

The decision said Liberty Ridge qualifies as a public accommodation because it regularly collects fees for space, facilities, services and meals, so it cannot be considered “distinctly private.”

“The fact that the Giffords also reside at Gifford Barn,” the decision says, “does not render it private.”

The farmer owners must pay $13,000 in fines and restitution, the agency ruled. Trainor said the Giffords are considering whether to appeal or pursue further legal action.

“Liberty Ridge Farm … has employed gay people and has conducted events for same-sex couples,” Trainor said. “The Giffords’ objection was to hosting and participating in the wedding ceremony itself and not to providing service in general to lesbians.”

McCarthy asked if it was legal for the farm to have a policy not to have ceremonies on the site, and Gifford responded that it was because “we are a private business,” according to the case.

The women, who are now married, filed a complaint with New York’s Division of Human Rights, and the administrative law judge said that Liberty Ridge “unlawfully discriminated against complainants solely on the basis of their sexual orientation.”

“All New Yorkers are entitled to their own religious beliefs, but businesses cannot discriminate based on sexual orientation any more than they can based on race or national origin,” said Mariko Hirose of the New York Civil Liberties Union, lead counsel for the couple.

The farm case represents the most recent legal challenge to private businesses that provide services for weddings but refuse service to same-sex couples.

Last year, the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that a Christian photographer could not refuse to shoot gay wedding ceremonies. Even though at the time the state did not officially recognize gay marriage, the court ruled that declining to photograph a gay wedding was similar to declining to work at an interracial wedding.

Most recently, a Pennsylvania bridal shop owner and a bakery owner turned away separate lesbian couples. Pennsylvania started allowing same-sex marriage in May after a federal judge struck down a ban on gay marriage in the state constitution.

Earlier this year, several states, including Kansas and Arizona, considered legislation that would allow people who object to same-sex marriage to cite their religious beliefs as a defense if faced with a discrimination lawsuit. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed the bill in her state; the Kansas bill died in the state Senate.

Public accommodation laws usually don’t apply to private residences, which is why this case is more unusual than previous ones, said Adam Winkler, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.

“It is just another case in the many battles in the fight over public accommodation of same-sex marriages,” Winkler said. “If you want to open yourself up to the public, there’s a cost, which is that you can’t discriminate.”

Recommended
1. Br. Jones
East Coast, MD,
Aug. 20, 2014

Before everyone hyperventilates: New York, like New Mexico, has a state law forbidding discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. Google "SONDA New York" for information about it. Businesses in states without such laws (including Utah) are still welcome to refuse patrons based on their orientation.

Whether or not you agree with such laws, if you are a business owner and your business is open to the public, it's your duty to know the laws of your state and municipality and abide by them.

2. Vanceone
Provo, UT,
Aug. 20, 2014

How can a gay marriage harm you if you are not gay?

Why, by fining you and threatening your livelihood, getting you fired if you don't have the "correct beliefs" (See: Brenden Eich) and in general you lose your rights if a gay person thinks they don't like you. After all, their right to "not be offended" quite clearly trumps any rights the rest of us have.
Freedom of speech? Nope. Freedom of the press? Just try to find a newspaper in the USA that doesn't cower from the threats of a gay lawsuit. Freedom to assemble? Well, this case and story shows you get fined for disagreeing with the gay agenda. Freedom of religion? How much longer before it's all "Hate speech" and you can't even worship in peace anymore--two years, max?

3. patriot
Cedar Hills, UT,
Aug. 20, 2014

freedom doesn't mean free anymore in America. Get used to it folks because the PC police is watching you....

4. water rocket
Magna, UT,
Aug. 20, 2014

It is obvious who's rights are being violated here. The farm family didn't deny any body anything except to use their property for the use of someone else's purposes. What ever happened to property rights? This is a horrible miscarriage of justice and should be appealed to a higher court.

5. Liberal Ted
Salt Lake City, UT,
Aug. 20, 2014

Now wait a minute. The LGBTQ community claimed that all they wanted was the right to marry. It was NOT going to interfere with religious beliefs at all.

But it does. They lied.